I am not a robot: Google changes text CAPTCHA, for quivery mouse clicks

Remember, back in 2013, when Ticketmaster - the world's largest online ticket retailer - decided   stop torturing people's eyeballs   By making them decipher the drops of molten characters in order to prove that they are human Remember, back in 2013, when Ticketmaster - the world's largest online ticket retailer - decided stop torturing people's eyeballs By making them decipher the drops of molten characters in order to prove that they are human?

In addition, Google is now also prickly with a captcha aggravating test, which is supposed to determine if we are robots or scripts used by spammers or other online misconduct villains, or if we are instead of real, living, warm-blooded monkeys.

CAPTCHA didn’t come out of Carnegie Mellon University and stands for “Turing’s Fully Automated Public Test to Tell Computers and People Apart.”

These tests are designed to be difficult for robots, easy for humans.

They usually consist of entering letters and / or numbers, from a distorted image.

Or, as a matter of fact, messages for go pleasure yourself . Or, again, math problems that will make your brain bleed.

Ten years in the use of CAPTCHA to keep robots from participating in dirty tricks on the Internet, “must weed out bots” has now become “absolutely stinks and fight bots”.

This is because the progress in the field of artificial intelligence led robots of creations, which are now able to solve even the most complex version of distorted text with 99.8% accuracy, in accordance with a recent Google research.

Not that Google is going to ban landfill visitors to weed out bots, against you.

Rather like this announced On Wednesday, Google is going to move away from the question for users to read the Blobby text and enter it into the field, as they did, for example, like this: Rather like this   announced   On Wednesday, Google is going to move away from the question for users to read the Blobby text and enter it into the field, as they did, for example, like this:

And instead, just ask us, "Are you not a robot?" with the fact that he calls the "No CAPTCHA, Recapture" API, for example, like this:

  with the fact that he calls the No CAPTCHA, Recapture API, for example, like this:

Asking us to check off the field, saying that “I am not a robot” would be an effective way of determining whether or not we are robots, because people move their cursors in a human-like way.

In particular, the difference between a bot and a person can be revealed in the tips, as thin as how the user (or bot) moves the cursor in brief moments before clicking the “I'm not a robot” button, according to Vinay SHET, product manager Captcha Team Google.

Without realizing this, people also drop evidence that they can develop whether we are automating or not: IP addresses and cookies show our movements elsewhere on the Internet and can help prove that we are not a bad actor.

Wired quotes SHET:

All this gives us a sample of how a person behaves. This is a whole bag of signals that make this difficult to fake a bot.

He said that there are other variables that will help make the definition, but those should be kept secret so that botmasters can figure out how to get around them and learn how to slip past Google filters again.

Google has been integrating automated bot detection into its captcha, at least 2013.

In October 2013, Google showed that he developed what he called its advanced risk analysis server-side recaptcha to filter out bots.

Basic not just look at what GobbledyGook we enter in the field. Most likely, he notes our entire engagement from a captcha, from beginning to end - before, during and after we enter into the field - to determine whether we are carbon-based.

On Valentine's Day, Google gave us a taste of what recaptcha can do presenting us with candy and flowers and pulsating hearts - the first two of which were rendered in a text that was simple (for people) to read.

It sounds great, but this is not the time to kiss the mysteriously distorted CAPTCHA, BLOBS goodbye.

Over the past week, Google tests, on sites that use CAPTCHA, have seen most people, but it still missed quite a bit. According to Wired, about 60% of WordPress users and 80% of users in the video sales game on the Humble Bundle website got past the CAPTCHA, only with a simple checkbox.

When the Advanced Risk Analysis engine of Google cannot understand what we are with a simple click, it will back up the test with a pop-up window of real users with the same old distorted text we have been enduring for years.

For mobile users, still not received as easy as one click. But when they encounter captcha on their mobile phone or tablet, they are now a much easier obstacle to jerk: instead of typing in the text, they will be asked to select all the images that match the image key.

As Google says, it is much easier to click photos of cats or turkeys than to enter a string of text on your phone:

As Google says, it is much easier to click photos of cats or turkeys than to enter a string of text on your phone:

And if you're worried about the implications of Google’s privacy analysis, where your mouse moves on the page, Shet noted that Google will only track your traffic on the CAPTCHA widget when it appears on other sites and not on the entire page.

This is how he put it on Wired:

You do not have to verify your identity to confirm your humanity.

In addition, as we noted earlier, tracking a move is not just a Google thing.

Facebook, Twitter, Gmail or any webpage you can track everything you do and can be your keyboard movement every movement of the pointer or by pressing a key.

Logging keystrokes is not a super secret, privacy sucking sauce vampire. This is the good old Web 1.0. This is not news, but it is definitely worth repeating: someone from a website can grab what you type, how you type if they want it.

The reality is that having a language that makes this kind of control possible is both powerful and ubiquitous.

It is a full-featured programming language that can be embedded in web pages, and all browsers support it. It has been around almost from the start on the Internet, and the web would have hurt without it, considering what makes it happen.

Among the many features of the language are the ability to track the position of the cursor, track keystrokes and call "home" without reloading the page or doing any visual display.

This is not typical of bad things. In fact, they are extremely helpful. Without them, it seems like sites like Facebook and Gmail will be almost unusable, searches will not automatically offer and Google Docs will not save our bacon in the background.

In the case of Google's advances with recaptcha, for example, the ability can stop a lot of bad bots from doing something that could be worse than annoying to withstand typing text from a Blobby image.

Think of bots that collect contact email addresses or guestbook pages, site scrapers that capture web content and reuse it without permission for automatically generated doorways, bots that participate in distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks, and much more.

I'll take the kittens, please!

Picture Captcha text kindly Shutterstock .